|Crossword puzzle or this?|
I've heard some argue that students can watch video at home and, therefore, school ought to be used for instruction. In other words, "We aren't paying you to show videos."
The problem with that argument is that it is highly unlikely that a student will ever choose to watch Citizen Kane at home. Most students don't spend their free time watching TED videos.
It certainly seems reasonable to question an Algebra 2 teacher who is showing The Lion King, but videos are a powerful way to capture students' attention and supplement instruction.
As the website manager for CERRA, I often hear from frustrated teachers who cannot access YouTube at school. Someone has to explain this policy to me. Why would a district deny teachers from accessing such an incredible resource? Oh I forgot. The schools that DO allow this have a HUGE problem with teachers wasting their days watching Minecraft videos.
As you can tell, I share the frustration of teachers who are blocked from the amazing, free supplements available on video sites like YouTube.
I guess there is a lingering bias against videos because most videos do not require students to read. Written material seems to be given AUTOMATIC preference over the same information presented in audio/video form. If you read my last post, you will realize how silly this bias is. The ability to read information will soon be automatic. What will matter is comprehension and application of knowledge.
This is personal to me because I prefer to learn through video. I love reading, but SEEING the information has always helped me comprehend concepts better. Having a visual to recall helps me RETAIN what I am learning.
Some of the most important experiences of my life have come by way of film. Films like Gandhi, Into the Wild, and Hotel Rwanda all made powerful impressions on me. The combination of visuals, music, and dialogue produced powerful emotions that motivated me to do more, be more.
Please don’t read this as an attack on books. Like many others, I often enjoy books more than their film adaptations. Books force you to imagine, and a medium of text only can produce its own kind of motivational power. I just don’t understand the anti-video sentiment that too often guides school/district policy.
So when I stumbled upon Jeff Dunn’s article entitled The 100 Best Video Sites for Educators, I felt like it would be great to share with you. I also knew that some of you would think to yourselves, “Sure. That’s great, but my district probably blocks most of those sites.” That’s why I wrote everything above first.
Here is my three-step plan to improve the state of video usage by teachers.
1. Organize a coalition of teachers at your school/district to collectively argue for free and open internet access for all teachers.
2. Ask to meet with administrators or district officials so that you can show them EXACTLY the kinds of FREE resources you and your students are being denied. In many cases, they simply don’t know much about these tools. Rather than taking the time to familiarize themselves with online tools and develop thoughtful policies, they take the easy road and ban them altogether.
3. Use Mozilla Firefox’s add-ons, RealPlayer, or other free online tools to download relevant videos at home. These video files can be saved on a flash drive or portable hard drive, brought into school, and played on your computer.
If none of this works, be patient. It was not too long ago when districts treated Facebook like an enemy. Now they all realize how important it is to use it as a free and efficient communication tool.
As on-to-one computing becomes the norm and tech-savvy folks takeover leadership roles, “videophobic” policies will evolve. It’s up to us to speed that evolution up.